Photo from

Seattle’s Garfield High School, home of the bulldogs, is used to winning.

Our jazz band is a perennial winner of the Essential Ellington national completion, our track and basketball team are perennial state contenders, our drumline took the top place in the end-of-the-year regional competition and we have award-winning clubs such as Junior State of America debate team and the knowledge bowl.

In the 2013-2014 school year, we’ll see the fruits of a whole different kind of victory: Not a high score on the test, but a defeat of the test itself. Not a win for a competition, but a victory for the solidarity of students, parents, and teachers in the struggle for authentic assessment over standardized testing.

Last winter, teachers at Garfield announced their unanimous vote to boycott the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) test.

“Our teachers have come together and agree that the MAP test is not good for our students, nor is it an appropriate or useful tool in measuring progress,” said Kris McBride, Garfield’s academic dean and testing coordinator, at a press conference. “Students don’t take it seriously. It produces specious results, and wreaks havoc on limited school resources during the weeks and weeks the test is administered.”

Teachers cited several facts: the MAP isn’t aligned to the curriculum, it is inappropriate for special-education students and English-language learners, and the makers of the test acknowledge that the test should not be used to evaluate teachers—as well as the fact that at the high school level, the test has a higher margin of error than expected gains, rendering it statistically invalid.

With that, Garfield High School launched a boycott of the MAP test that spread to other schools in the city and helped spark a national movement to oppose the abuses of standardized testing. In the ensuing weeks and months we saw, in what is becoming known as the “education spring,” Portland students initiate their own boycott of the OAKS tests, some 10,000 parents and students march in Texas against the overuse of high-stakes tests, and kindergartners and their parents stage a “play-in” at the Chicago School District headquarters against the replacement of the arts with norm-referenced exams, among many other examples.

The Seattle School District initially threatened to punish teachers —including a 10-day suspension without pay — but with the unanimous vote of the Garfield High School Parent-Teacher-Student Association and student government, and after hundreds of phone calls and emails from parents and teachers around the country poured in, they eventually backed off from the attack. After months of rallies, teach-ins, call-ins, and opt-outs, we received proof positive that a group of determined people can still make change.

In an all-district email sent on May 13, Superintendent José Banda wrote, “High schools may opt out of MAP in 2013-14.”

This victory against a standardized test represents a high-stakes test for education reformers who have attempted to reduce the intellectual process of teaching and learning to selecting answer choices, A, B, C or D. Their entire project of denying students graduation, firing teachers, closing schools and privatizing education through the proliferation of charter schools rests on their ability to reduce teachers and students to a single score.

In an effort to demonstrate what authentic assessment could be, educators in Seattle established a teachers work group on assessment, which engaged in months of research resulting in the “Markers of Quality Assessment” — recommended guidelines for developing assessments. The guidelines promote assessments that reflect actual student knowledge and learning, not just test-taking skills; are educational in and of themselves; are free of gender, class and racial bias; are differentiated to meet students’ needs; allow opportunities to go back and improve; undergo regular evaluation and revision by educators.

The work group concluded that quality assessments, at their base, must integrate with classroom curriculum, measure student growth toward standards achievement and take the form of performance tasks. Teachers across Seattle are working this summer to use these guidelines to develop assessments that will replace MAP with high-quality assessments that stem from the actual work being done in the classroom across the curriculum.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has called education “the civil rights issue of our time.” His vision of this civil rights movement is his signature Race to the Top program that pits school districts against each other in a vicious competition for desperately needed federal funding. Only the districts that promote charter schools and increase the use of standardized testing are eligible for these federal dollars.

Duncan even went as far as proposing that the anti-teacher and anti-public education film “Waiting for Superman” was the “Rosa Parks moment” of the movement for education. Secretary Duncan is right that the struggle for quality education is a major civil rights issue of our time. Yet I seem to remember that the civil rights movement wasn’t started by billionaires, their foundations or a film they sponsored.

If I remember correctly — I do teach U.S. history, so I hope I got this right — the civil rights movement was launched with a certain boycott. As Garfield special education teacher Serena Samar said of the MAP boycott victory, “Our actions as a staff have reignited the belief that a group of people can make a difference.”

If we ever hope to transform our schools from “fill-in-the-bubble” factories into problem-solving academies that nurture the critical thinking, creativity and collaboration necessary for young people to overcome endless war, mass incarceration and climate change, it will take nothing short of the kind of mass civil disobedience that propelled the civil rights movement.

A version of this commentary was originally published in GOOD. More GOOD at

Featuring a broad range of perspectives on standardized testing in schools, Town Hall  Seattle is hosting the panel discussion, “To Test or Not to Test” on Tuesday, Sept. 17, starting at 7:30 p.m. Voices include Wayne Au,  an associate professor of education at the University of Washington Bothell. Details:

Previous articleThe IE’s Annual Pacific Reader: A Literary Supplement of APIA Book Reviews Going on 30 Years Strong
Next articleWhy Are So Few Chinese Youth Applying for DACA?